Thursday, August 9, 2012

Cultural Disobedience


Cultural Disobedience

Meléndez López Teodulo



XXI century philosophy is also using technological possibilities through reflection on dialogue. The policy is then collective and dialogical essay to address the dangers of collapse, in this case the twenty-first century, a world whose disappearance seems to look with amazement. To raise no new dogmas we must always think. Some thinkers like Raul Fornet call this "cultural disobedience" by analogy with "civil disobedience" that is, to arrive at an intercultural philosophy that prevents a new dam stabilization mechanisms must be in constant motion to prevent the occurrence or of renewed totalitarianism or mere formal apparatus as happened to representative democracy. We call instituting power to prevent the consecration of dogmas that are essentially unphilosophical and therefore undemocratic.

The big fall regarding daily and before we are left empty, each one of us go to our own inner world even if there is what Fernando Sabater scornfully called "the crowing on-line virtual nursery." There has been no talk who assembled at the time and looking at the requirements that are arriving every day without pause. Philosophizing is now looking for pragmatism. It is largely the left point from which Feuerbach and Marx, rethink the real man. So much, then the two wrote in their times and other approaches were

This man has a body, history and memory. A philosophical anthropology is not about an unchanging essence, but an agent of social and political transformation. You mean an epistemological shift must occur in the investigations. As never have to clarify the relationship between the human subject and the objective world. Ethics is key issue in XXI century politics. We must grasp new ways of decoding reality. Edgar Morin (Seven complex lessons in education for the future), it raises the need for a reform of thought, paradigmatic and programmatic. You need to think for an embodiment of humanity.

There are many ways of studying politics: Political Science, Political Philosophy, Political Theory, Political Sociology, Political Economy, Political Law, Political History, Political Anthropology, Political Psychology Political Geography and the most recently, Geoeconomics as Political Ecology and Political Axiology. All differ or all overlap, is not important. The important thing is to find the best form of government, the nature of "politics" and the methodology. Bobbio and Sartori have made their voices heard about it. What you need to do is to move ideas and values ​​into political action. Can not provide certainty, but an intelligent action. Many argue that political anthropology is the foundation of modern political philosophy, as to any proposal in the political field presides an image of man, their needs and interests and their mean values. An anthropology for the study was not remotely but this transformation. And a political axiology scrutinize political values, because democracy and politics are values ​​and because we must move towards an ethic of the collective.

teodulolopezm@yahoo.com

No comments:

Post a Comment